Not a day goes by that I'm not disappointed by what Wikipedia turned into. It went all the way from trying to be "sum of all human knowledge" under "neutral point of view" to cutting everything not "notable" enough and just mindlessly parroting establishment view.
That's tolerable when the establishment knows what they're saying, like in science articles. Well, mostly. Unfortunately this policy gets extended to domains without anything resembling genuine experts, and nowhere is it more ridiculous than with "film critics".
It's one thing to mindlessly parrot some social scientist who fudges statistics and uses questionable methodology, but is at least pretending to do science. Treating someone speaking out of their ass as a "reliable source" just because someone gave them a newspaper column to publish at is a mockery of what Wikipedia used to stand for in its early days.
There is an objective measure of film quality - enjoyment by the audience. And we have pretty good metrics of that - like IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes audience score. Such metrics occasionally suffer from issues like vote stuffing, demographic imbalance of voters compared with movie watching audience, less representative sampling for very old or foreign movies, and occasional overrating of most recent movies before it regresses to the mean, but it's insanity not to take these aggregates as starting points.
Even these issues are mostly overstated. IMDB filters handle vote spam quite well, voter demographics while imperfect tends to be far more representable than film critic demographics, and as for questionable early ratings due to hype, just check out how many completely forgettable movies managed to win an Oscars somehow. That reminds me, what was the Oscar list for the year of The Empire Strikes Back? It's hilarious in hindsight.
So what Wikipedia's doing? Ignoring all real data, and just parroting establishment of course!
MCU Movie Ratings
So here are the objective ratings, in chronological order:- Iron Man - 7.9
- The Incredible Hulk - 6.8
- Iron Man 2 - 7.0
- Thor - 7.0
- Captain America: The First Avenger - 6.9
- Marvel's The Avengers - 8.1
- Iron Man 3 - 7.2
- Thor: The Dark World - 7.0
- Captain America: The Winter Soldier - 7.8
- Guardians of the Galaxy - 8.1
- Avengers: Age of Ultron - 7.4
- Ant-Man - 7.3
- Captain America: Civil War - 7.8
- Doctor Strange - 7.5
- Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 - 7.7
- Spider-Man: Homecoming - 7.5
- Thor: Ragnarok - 7.9
- Black Panther - 7.5
- Avengers: Infinity War - 8.7
- Ant-Man and the Wasp - 7.6
But don't mind me, statistically speaking you're far more likely to enjoy what other people enjoy than what some cat blogger or film critic likes. All I can do is provide a bit of context for those numbers.
The best one
- Avengers: Infinity War - 8.7
However, it might not be the best movie to start with. It's really good if you're invested in the story, and know at least half the characters. Otherwise, it will probably be too confusing.
Really good movies
- Iron Man - 7.9
- Marvel's The Avengers - 8.1
- Captain America: The Winter Soldier - 7.8
- Guardians of the Galaxy - 8.1
- Captain America: Civil War - 7.8
- Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 - 7.7
- Thor: Ragnarok - 7.9
Thor and Captain America have some good movies, unfortunately their first movies are rather mediocre. So you can either start with their first weak movie because it gets better eventually, or just read its plot summary and get straight to the better ones. Nobody will blame you for skipping early Thors, honest.
Watchable movies
- Avengers: Age of Ultron - 7.4
- Ant-Man - 7.3
- Doctor Strange - 7.5
- Spider-Man: Homecoming - 7.5
- Black Panther - 7.5
- Ant-Man and the Wasp - 7.6
Notable here is Black Panther, which due to the nearly all-black cast became inevitable battleground of culture wars. It's decent movie, but it's massively overrated by the overwhelmingly liberal film critics, and this generates a bit of audience backlash. It's definitely far better than the trainwreck Wonder Woman was, but every single MCU movie is far better than Wonder Woman, even Thor 1.
Forgettable movies
- The Incredible Hulk - 6.8
- Iron Man 2 - 7.0
- Thor - 7.0
- Captain America: The First Avenger - 6.9
- Iron Man 3 - 7.2
- Thor: The Dark World - 7.0
Unless you're really invested in the MCU, it's probably best to skip them. Personally I quite enjoyed Iron Man 2-3 movies, but I definitely have preference for sillier movies that most people don't share, and I can totally see why they did not get universal aclaim.
None of them are key to anything, and a huge added benefit of skipping them all is avoiding Natalie Portman, who according to some is the most annoying actress in Hollywood [citation needed].
So that's it for today. If you know of anyone who's working on an encyclopedia which follows Neutral Point of View, please let me know.
None of them are key to anything, and a huge added benefit of skipping them all is avoiding Natalie Portman, who according to some is the most annoying actress in Hollywood [citation needed].
So that's it for today. If you know of anyone who's working on an encyclopedia which follows Neutral Point of View, please let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment